🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, campaigners, and parents are observing closely to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising group of nations are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that phones and networks are "robbing our youngsters' innocence". A law could be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban could be "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to enact a law increasing the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in the Netherlands has urged guardians to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory statement calling for a ban for under-16s without parental consent is provided. While it cautions of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the move does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A clear age restriction is a good foundation," stated the European lawmaker behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in robust research".

Last year, interest grew behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration committed to further research the matter.

Charities have expressed apprehensions. An organization established by the relatives of a young person who was lost after viewing disturbing social media material suggests that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "dangerous transition" of harm when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for minors," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, action is largely unfolding at the state level due to national gridlock.

• The state of Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting minors to a single hour of social media use per day, with additional time dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws requiring guardian approval for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from some figures to follow this example, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Apart from the West, additional states are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies adopt a more measured stance. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans have downsides and "may even have unintended consequences". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in safety.

While this international debate evolves, the actions of the Australian government and its followers demonstrate that states around the world are increasingly prepared to delay for platforms to act voluntarily.